22.1.09
Artist: Adi Nes
Lunch
Collecting Contemporary Art
Arin gave examples from a New York Times article that broke down various investments one could have made in 1998 for 100,000 dollars and what they would be worth today. The obvious point is that art can be a good investment and the moral is that despite these hard “economic times [,] art remains the best and most enduring investment opportunity”.
Herb and Dorothy Vogel are the new poster child for collecting contemporary art on a dime. In case you have been living under a rock they are the couple from New York who devoted their lives and modest earnings to collecting contemporary art. They bought art for the love of art for over 45 years and because they were able to apparently, unconsciously, predict the trends in art their collection of more than 4,500 works now ranks among the best. The Vogel's collection includes works by such artist as Sol LeWitt, Donald Judd, Richard Tuttle and Steven Keister.
If you can’t live without it then you should probably buy it.
21.1.09
Artist: Michael Lazarus
Materials he uses in his works: collage, acrylic, latex, enamel, mirrors and wood.
In 2000 Holland Cotter wrote of Michael Lazarus:
“Michael Lazarus does scary things with what might, in other hands, pass for geometric abstraction. He divides his paintings in big asymmetrical sections, which he fills with oddball colors -- mustard, pink, pea green, burgundy -- sometimes full-bodied and bright, sometimes wan and soiled.
To this foundation he adds a slender but potent arsenal of emblems. They include images of upwardly licking flames, of a kind one finds in Tibetan painting, and areas of collage. Recurring in almost every painting is a mask like oval, a cross between a smiley face and the skull on a bottle of poison.”
It seems that six plus years later his artwork is continuing along this path.
In the L.A. Now Exhibit the three works by Lazarus are entitled Embrace (2006), Reverse (2006) and Charmer’s Lair (2007)
In a 2006 article by David Pagel he describes the patterns in Lazarus’ work as evocative of Op Art.
Op Art is an art movement that was coined in a 1964 article in Time Magazine titled: Op Art: Pictures That Attack The Eye. Op Art has largely been viewed as a term used to describe ‘Sleights of Art’ where the artist uses illusions to create movement. The use of colors, value, patterns, texture, shapes and line are employed in such a way as to suggest that there exists a stationary back-ground. The eye is made to be fooled and thus an illusion of something that is not real is created. A common optical effect employed by Op is the use of light reflection or shimmer.
The Op Art’s influence on Lazarus’ work is evident in all three of his works in the LA Now exhibit. In Charmer’s Lair he also uses the Op Art reflection technique. Lazarus’ work is a mathematically-based composition relying heavily on the use of geometric shapes and organic spirals to create a sense of movement. He also creates an interesting effect using negative space. Lazarus' works include cut outs exposing, in this case, the white wall on which it is mounted. The use of negative space is not only an element of art but it is also a technique that is used specifically in the creation of Op Art.
Lazarus’ was most likely influenced by Victor Vasarely and MC Escher:
Another quote regarding Op Art:
“Scornful of the emotionalism and accident in abstract expressionism, op artists know where they stand. Precision is their pleasure. Their art instantly engages the beholder, yet does not demand his involvement or insist that he relate it to the world of objects, emotions or experiences. Op fascinates the way a kaleidoscope does a child.”
I find Lazarus’ art style interesting because he is obviously influenced by Op Art. Common to his art work is the rushed sense of imperfection. He does not clean up his paint lines or spend too much time on creating details within his art.
As David Pagel writes in his 2006 article: Into a void of inhuman beauty:
“Neither precious nor fussy, they seem to have been urgently crafted, as if he had no time to spare and getting the job done was more important than nailing every detail. The handmade imperfections provide character and pathos.”
In short the characteristics of Op Art are:
- Op Art is, almost without exception, non-representational.
- The principles of art employed (color, line and shape) are carefully chosen to achieve maximum effect.
- The critical techniques used in Op Art are perspective and juxtaposition of color
- In Op Art, space both positive and negative are of equal importance.
Collage:
In ‘Charmers Lair’, Lazarus uses the technique of collage (From the French: coller, to glue) which is a form of visual arts made by ‘assemblage’ of different forms, thus creating a new whole. An artistic collage work may include newspaper/magazine clippings, bits of colored or hand-made papers, portions of other artwork, photographs, Etc., glued to a piece of paper, wood or canvas.
Techniques of collage were first used at the time of the invention of paper in China around 200 BC. The term collage however was coined in the beginning of the 20th century by both Georges Braque and Pablo Picasso (Guggenheim Museum's online art glossary) when collage became a distinctive part of modern art. According to some sources, Picasso was the first to use the collage technique in oil paintings. According to the Guggenheim Museum's online article about collage, Braque took up the concept of collage itself before Picasso, applying it to charcoal drawings. Picasso adopted collage immediately after.
Collage, according to these sources, is an artistic concept associated with the beginnings of modernism and entails much more than the idea of gluing something onto something else. The glued-on patches which Braque and Picasso added to their canvases 'collided with the surface plane of the painting'. Lazarus’ works are textured and it is obvious where the painting ends and the glueing of magazines starts. The origins of collage in terms of ‘modern art’ were part of a ''methodical reexamination of the relation between painting and sculpture'', and these new works "gave each medium some of the characteristics of the other," according to the Guggenheim essay. Although Lazarus’ works are clearly meant to be mounted on walls they have the characteristics of a three dimensional piece through the use of collage onto a wood surface. Furthermore, these cut-up bits of magazine create fragments of ‘externally referenced meaning’ into the works.
6.1.09
Peter Carey
Carey is an Australian native who up until 1976 made his living primarily in the advertising industry. He wrote when he was not working and eventually 1976 was able to start writing full-time.
I read his book The Unusual Life of Tristan Smith (1994) about ten years ago. I just finished his latest novel His Illegal Self (2008) and find his style to be mesmerizing and his themes consistent. (http://petercareybooks.com/)
In The Unusual Life of Tristan Smith the protagonist is born with a cognitive memory and terrible disfigurement. His body is a great source of perpetual pain as is his memory. In His Illegal Self, Che is taken from his privileged reality and thrust into a word of underground, overgrown organic textures, smells and grimy people. In both books the protagonist is on a mission to discover their father; Tristan who he is and Che where he is. Both novels take place in worlds that are reminiscent of perhaps reality but certainly are never established, mostly just suggested. It is these make-believe worlds that stimulate the reader to exercise their own memory banks and grasp at certain similarities within actuality whether in the past, present or it has even been suggested- the future.
Carey’s writing is stimulating in that it prods the reader every word of the way. It is not writing that requires a dictionary but certainly if not given your undivided attention the novel can and will turn on you within the sentence.
Contemporary Art
I am reluctant to comment on Andy Warhol’s art as contemporary. After all, what do rockets and television have to do with us now?
‘Graffiti art’ is raw contemporary art. Indicative not only of urban culture but often used as a political platform and as a commentary for present day issues.
David Hockney, well known for his use of photomontage not only uses modern techniques but his art also reflects on homosexuality which although not a ‘new’ issue is certainly one of much heated debate for modern times. As a naturalist artist who is still working/living I would venture that it would be impossible to not consider him a contemporary artist. (http://www.davidhockney.com-/ his bio is cleverly written)